EducationFundingData.com

Are "receiving" towns driving up costs?

Under Acts 60 and 68, there are so-called "sending" towns and "recieving" towns.  "Sending" towns are those that raise more in education taxes than they spend on education locally.  As a result, they "send" the additional education tax dollars for use by "receiving" towns.  "Receiving" towns are those that raise less in education taxes than they spend locally and as a result "receive" the funds needed to cover the remaining expense.  Essentially, these funds come from the "sending" towns.  It is sometimes suggested that because "receiving" towns can approve budgets for amounts beyond what will be raised locally in tax dollars and have the difference covered by "sending" towns, they will be more likely to increase education spending. Analysis of actual data suggests that this is not in fact happening.

For this analysis, the towns were divided into two groups.  "Sending towns" were defined as those whose 2005 education taxes raised exceeded their 2005 education spending budget.  "Receiving towns" were defined as those whose 2005 education taxes raised were less than their 2005 education spending budget.  For the entire list of towns, each town was "bucketed" based on how their spending per pupil compared to all other towns.  The buckets were:

As the graph below illustrates, "sending" towns are more likely to be in the "Top 25%" and "Upper 25%" of spending per pupil than "receiving" towns.Vermont spending per pupil - sending vs receiving towns
Here's the same information presented in tabular form:

Spending per Student Sending Towns Receiving Towns
Bottom 25% 13 50
Lower 25% 9 55
Upper 25% 19 45
Top 25% 19 45


Copyright (C) 2006 by Ken Dufort